Citizendium read-restrictions & quick technical notes
March 22nd, 2007 at 6:25 pm (wiki)
Is it just me, or can anyone else not read the new without logging in, including the following pages:
- , on the citizendium itself.
- .
- .
Having to login to edit, that I can understand (given the vandalism problems, and that it’s a pilot), but surely the above pages at the very least should be open for public viewing? Surely this stuff is “need-to-know” information for potential editors trying to determine if the project is for them?
I find hiding that stuff rather curious, and it made me curious about what else they’re doing. A couple of tech notes after a quick bit of poking around the new site, but not logging in :
- Despite , they seem to have placed the site in the root directory, rather than the “wiki/” folder.
- .
- MediaWiki 1.8.2 (since we cannot check without logging in).
- You can access these wiki pages without logging in: and , and the Main page, and that’s basically about it.
- From the , they’re running Apache/2.0.59 (CentOS), and from are using PHP 5.1.6.
- From , they probably haven’t tried to make any static dumps yet.
- From the absence of an error , they have created a “profiling” table in their database.
- They probably want to and with PHP in their apache2.conf.
- They should probably delete .
- From the different apache error messages (“Forbidden” versus “Not found”), they have installed, as well as , and (like the Wikipedia). However, unlike the Wikipedia, they probably do not have these extensions installed: , , , , , , , , , , , , , and . I say probably, because some extensions got reorganized a bit in subversion at the start of this year, so depending on when they downloaded their extensions, it could have a different default directory structure. Nevertheless, some of those extensions are used in Wikipedia content (e.g. ParserFunctions, ImageMap, wikiheiro), and I suspect it would be easiest to just use the same extensions, especially those that alter parser behaviour, if you’re planning on building on Wikipedia content.
As a personal opinion, at the very least I think they should allow anon access to Special:Export for pages in the main namespace, as well as the list of recent changes, because that way information can be shared in a two-way street between the Wikipedia and Citizendium. That would certainly be an interesting bot project for someone (to keep the two sites in sync, and flag those edits that cannot be automatically synced for human review), and if it results in better quality articles for either or both sites, then I’m all for it.
Also, there is a in MediaWiki (which makes linking to a special list of external sites easier). It could be nice to have the citizendium included in this list by default, if their articles are publicly accessible. Heck, if they come to the party, and share what they’re doing in an open way, I’ll even add it myself! (Of course, it may get reverted by someone else, but that’s up to them, not me).